RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

Hi Xiaohu

|I wonder whether the RRG is to design a new architecture or 
|just to fix the
|scalability issue of IPv6. And I think it will determine how 
|much change we
|can make in the Internet architecture.
|In other word, should HIP like approach be taken into RRG's 
|consideration
|provided that there was no separate working group and research group in
|IETF/IRTF? 


We have a great deal of freedom to propose anything that results in a better
routing architecture.  Obviously, it should be clearly motivated and a
rational extrapolation from the solution that we set forth.

Could we specifically recommend HIP?  Certainly, however working on it here
would seem somewhat redundant.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg