[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Moving forward...



Hi,

On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:48 PM, William Herrin wrote:
1. The IPv6 variant (which may be but probably isn't compatible with IPv4) 2. The IPv4 variant (which is compatible with but likely suboptimal for IPv6)
3. The clean-slate variant which we could design if we weren't
constrained by IPv4 or IPv6.

In a world of limited resources, which should be the priority?

Thanks,
-drc


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg