Re: [RRG] Moving forward...

["William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:48 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> 1. The IPv6 variant (which may be but probably isn't compatible with IPv4)
>> 2. The IPv4 variant (which is compatible with but likely suboptimal for
>> IPv6)
>> 3. The clean-slate variant which we could design if we weren't
>> constrained by IPv4 or IPv6.
>
> In a world of limited resources, which should be the priority?


David,

The one that demonstrably impacts the largest installed customer base,
obviously.

But that's a false question. The limited resource is not manhours but
rather the creative input of the group's participants. Like with the
Manhattan Project, that creative input usually benefits from pursuing
multiple solution paths to completion.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg