Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?

["William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> My point was that, if my thinking is correct (and if it's not, can someone
> please point out where I've gone wrong), it's not reasonable to
> simultaneously say 'I want location/identity separation' and also say 'I
> don't want to change existing host software' and 'I think a big mapping
> database is not feasible'. If you want the first, one of the next two _has_
> to give; the only question is _which_.

Noel,

I also agree with this statement.

I note that it is predicated on the assumption that routing is
required to follow business relationships. If routing was allowed to
follow some more-aggregable criteria (e.g. geography) the statement
might not be true. However, I agree that routing is required to follow
business relationships.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg