RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications

["Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>]

 > 
> |> As has been said before, all of the translation options 
> are basically 
> |> architected NAT.
> |> 
> |> To adapt to this, applications can either perform NAT
> |kludges or change to
> |> truly operate on a separate and clear identifier.
> |
> |Well yes, but many of the solutions deliver the original 
> packet, and it 
> |seems that in the particular case Christian was describing, Six/One 
> |Router would deliver a translated packet. That doesn't happen with a 
> |map/encap solution.
> 
> 
> This can be viewed as a drawback of the map&encap solutions: 
> no forward progress in actually changing the root of the architecture.
> 
> ;-)
> 

So the best solution would enable both using NAT techniques and/or
delivering the original packet? 

Just checking.... ;-) back at you.


-Darrel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg