RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|> It would seem like it would be no different than today.  If 
|one had a host
|> without a FQDN, then you would need to refer to it using a 
|full 128 bit
|> locator and identifier.
|
|Provided there are some hosts without FQDNs, does that mean we need a
|separate id/locator resolution infrastructure except the 
|current DNS system?


Not at all.  Such systems would be reachable via their explicit /128, just
like today.  This is just pure legacy IPv6 functionality.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg