re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt

[Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>]

> |I'm confused by what you said. In Noel's Endpoint Name draft, the first
> |requirement for the host identifier is global uniqueness. Is
> |that wrong?
> 
> 
> You'd have to ask Noel.  Ran clearly disagrees.  FWIW, our earlier
> experiences with GSE point to the fact that truly achieving guaranteed
> global uniqueness is already hard.  The best that we can easily do is
> statistical uniqueness.

Hi Tony,

Thanks a lot for your clarification. I think I'd better to ask Ran since he
disagrees with the above requirement ;)

Xiaohu XU

> |Or
> |you just want to use the locator identifier pair together as a globally
> |unique identifier. Then should this pair keep stable in a long
> |run just like
> |the home address in mobile IP?
> 
> 
> Again, Ran is specifying that the identifier be locally unique, so yes,
the
> (L, I) pair should be globally unique.  I make no claims about its
> stability, especially in the face of roaming.  Again, you should ask Ran,
> it's his proposal.
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg



--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg