Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering

[Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>]

I haven't voted because the question is not precise enough:

> Initiated by Tony Li.
> Assuming current renumbering technology, what amount of renumbering  
> can be required in the RRG's recommended routing architecture?

"current renumbering technology" could mean a whole lot of things  
including typing in new addresses. "amount" doesn't provide any value  
and can't be quantified to any value. And "RRG recommend architecture"  
is also vague. Does it mean a new routing architecture or the Loc/ID  
split architectures we have been discussing?

If the question was:

Does a Locator/ID split solution require sites or core devices to  
renumber before it actually can work?

It would be easier to answer honestly.

Dino

On Aug 28, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Tony Li wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We've only gotten a handfull of responses to our consensus check.   
> The poll
> can be found here:
>
> http://www.doodle.ch/participation.html?pollId=ziu439pxxpcx33da
>
> I'd really like to see some broader participation.  We've certainly  
> heard
> lots of opinions, so I know that you're out there...
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg