[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: about draft-ietf-multi6-l3shim-00.txt

Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
Erik, just a few more nits: 

Thanks for the careful read.

page 5:  "identifier - an IP layer identifier" seems like a circular
definition, especially since "identifier" does not seem to be often
used in the text without a qualifying "IP" preceding it.  Perhaps, in
parallel to the address definition it could say: "IP identifier - an
IP layer name for an endpoint (stack name in [NSRG])..."


ok

page 5:  "NOTE:  This proposal does not contain any IP layer
identifiers"  But it does discuss a number of options.  Suggest
"NOTE:  This proposal does not define any IP layer identifiers, but
discusses some options in Section 9."

How about
NOTE: This proposal does not specify any new form of IP layer identifier, but
still separates the identifying and locating properties of the IP addresses.

page 19: Previously (Sec 2.1) you define X as a malicious host, but
then you seem to use host X in a non-malicious context here.
Actually, I don't recall where X is malicious within this document,
so maybe revise 2.1?


I'll fix this use of X.

I fixed the other nits as well.

   Erik