[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: how mobile do we want to be

To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: Re: how mobile do we want to be
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:45:51 +0100
Cc: shim6@psg.com
In-reply-to: <p06200740be6328d55e6d@[10.0.0.171]>
Organization: IBM
References: <2005319211437.576540@bbfujip7> <p06200740be6328d55e6d@[10.0.0.171]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
...

I do have one concern about this part of the charter -- it cites I-Ds, and I am not sure that all of those I-Ds will eventually be published as RFCs in their current form. Kurtis, Geoff and Brian -- which of the I-Ds cited in the charter have been submitted to the IESG for publication? What should we do with the others? Are they expected to be updated over time, or will their mention here limit the useful lifetime of this charter to <6 months?


 draft-ietf-multi6-things-to-think-about-01.txt
  Approved - in RFC queue
 draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-threats-03.txt
  In IESG Evaluation

 draft-huston-l3shim-arch-00.txt
 draft-ietf-multi6-functional-dec-00.txt
 draft-ietf-multi6-l3shim-00.txt
 draft-ietf-multi6-failure-detection-00.txt
 draft-ietf-multi6-hba-00.txt
 draft-ietf-multi6-app-refer-00.txt
  These are not ready for the IESG.
  The plan is that the new WG will inherit them and do what it wants with
  them; so indeed the charter would need (trivial) updating in about 6 months.

     Brian

References:
- Re: how mobile do we want to be
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
- Re: how mobile do we want to be
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>

Prev by Date: Re: shim - transport/app communication
Next by Date: shim - transport/network communication
Previous by thread: Re: how mobile do we want to be
Next by thread: Re: how mobile do we want to be
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread