[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: charter [Re: how mobile do we want to be]

To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: charter [Re: how mobile do we want to be]
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:10:24 +0200 (EET)
Cc: shim6@psg.com, Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
In-reply-to: <2e1c8123ade9a09c8be42ccb7c4c7364@it.uc3m.es>
References: <20053211197.689748@bbprime> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503212130400.24091@netcore.fi> <2e1c8123ade9a09c8be42ccb7c4c7364@it.uc3m.es>

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

So, as i see it this covers the ingress filtering problem, the establishement of new communications after an outage and the preservation of new communications.

Agreed. I counted being able to deal with ingress filtering and (obviously) being able to establish new communications after an outage as implicit requirements for the work, not needing spelling out. But it doesn't hurt, of course.

Besides, some understanding of TE concerns is also within scope (ok, i agree that probably we won't be able to achieve features equivalent to those available in BGP v4 solution with respect to this)


Exactly.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- Re: how mobile do we want to be
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
- charter [Re: how mobile do we want to be]
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: charter [Re: how mobile do we want to be]
  - From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>

Prev by Date: Re: proposed text for charter
Next by Date: Re: how mobile do we need to be (was Re: how mobile do we want to be)
Previous by thread: Re: charter [Re: how mobile do we want to be]
Next by thread: RE: how mobile do we want to be
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread