[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Open question and Critical dependencies

To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:05:50 -0400
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, shim6 <shim6@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <258caea0a88dcba54e9eb3e31cc3a98c@muada.com>
References: <20054902637.725336@BBPRIME> <258caea0a88dcba54e9eb3e31cc3a98c@muada.com>


On 9 Apr 2005, at 09:27, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

Also, what is this nonsense of "eliminate the use of NATs". There is no NAT in IPv6 so there is nothing to eliminate.

I'm not closely following this thread, so don't interpret this as me taking sides, or in fact contributing to the point at hand. However, warning bells are triggered by words such as those on your last sentence, since these things exist, presumably because people have asked for them and plan to deploy them:

<http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/tech/tk361/c1550/ ccmigration_09186a008018221e.pdf>

Joe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

References:
- Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
- Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
Next by Date: Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
Next by thread: Re: Open question and Critical dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread