Re: Open question and Critical dependencies

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 10-apr-05, at 23:05, Joe Abley wrote:

> > Also, what is this nonsense of "eliminate the use of NATs". There is  
> > no NAT in IPv6 so there is nothing to eliminate.

> I'm not closely following this thread, so don't interpret this as me  
> taking sides, or in fact contributing to the point at hand. However,  
> warning bells are triggered by words such as those on your last  
> sentence, since these things exist,

I don't think so.

> <http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/tech/tk361/c1550/ 
> ccmigration_09186a008018221e.pdf>

Read what's in this file more carefully. It's not IPv6-to-IPv6 address  
translation.