Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

"Fred L. Templin" wrote:
...
> Summary - the wording in sections (1) and (7) seems to mandate
> lowest-common-denominator solutions and ignore solutions that
> provide a better fit.

It's hard to avoid special pleading (since the transition solution
with my name on it is in the list), but I do think that there is a strong
argument for concentrating on LCD solutions for the first wave.

We might contemplate a separate IETF activity for advanced transition
solutions.

   Brian