Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> "Fred L. Templin" wrote:
> ...
> > Summary - the wording in sections (1) and (7) seems to mandate
> > lowest-common-denominator solutions and ignore solutions that
> > provide a better fit.
> 
> It's hard to avoid special pleading (since the transition solution
> with my name on it is in the list), but I do think that there is a strong
> argument for concentrating on LCD solutions for the first wave.
> 
> We might contemplate a separate IETF activity for advanced transition
> solutions.

I agree with Brian.

People already have problems trying to choose which cars to buy.  Guides
and expert knowledge help a bit but it's still difficult. It's quite much
simpler if you don't have all that many choices to make.  People don't get
stuck on details, and we can concentrate better on really pressing matters
(if any).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords