RE: ocean: do not boil

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

Thats fine I suspected you did not.  Thats why we all come here to share our views and do work. 

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: itojun@iijlab.net [mailto:itojun@iijlab.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:43 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil 
> 
> 
> >> The piece that I think your missing is pretty simple 
> really.  The customer
> >> does not want a parallel IPv4 infrastructure and wants it 
> removed as soon
> >> as possible.
> 
> 	in almost all of the installation of IPv6, they run 
> IPv4 and IPv6 in
> 	parallel - usually IPv4 is NATed, and IPv6 is globally reachable
> 	(sometimes IPv6 filtering device is in place).  i don't 
> share your
> 	view on this aspect on customer demand.
> 
> itojun
>