[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ocean: do not boil
- To: <itojun@iijlab.net>
- Subject: RE: ocean: do not boil
- From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 04:03:57 -0400
- Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 01:06:22 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
- Thread-index: AcJlBqNgM4o1CtuhSyWOC/aMvy2NdAALIKpA
- Thread-topic: ocean: do not boil
Thats fine I suspected you did not. Thats why we all come here to share our views and do work.
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: itojun@iijlab.net [mailto:itojun@iijlab.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:43 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil
>
>
> >> The piece that I think your missing is pretty simple
> really. The customer
> >> does not want a parallel IPv4 infrastructure and wants it
> removed as soon
> >> as possible.
>
> in almost all of the installation of IPv6, they run
> IPv4 and IPv6 in
> parallel - usually IPv4 is NATed, and IPv6 is globally reachable
> (sometimes IPv6 filtering device is in place). i don't
> share your
> view on this aspect on customer demand.
>
> itojun
>