RE: ocean: do not boil

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

for me it is demand.  or the customer is always right.  We will need
multiple solutions to resolve multiple demands.  I don't see necessity
as principle from my view at all.

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Tansley [mailto:stansley@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:11 PM
> To: itojun@iijlab.net; Bound, Jim
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: ocean: do not boil 
> 
> 
> Is it demand, or is it necessity.
> 
> Stewart.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: itojun@iijlab.net [mailto:itojun@iijlab.net] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:43 PM
> > To: Bound, Jim
> > Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil 
> > 
> > 
> > >> The piece that I think your missing is pretty simple 
> really.  The 
> > >> customer does not want a parallel IPv4 infrastructure 
> and wants it 
> > >> removed as soon as possible.
> > 
> > 	in almost all of the installation of IPv6, they run 
> > IPv4 and IPv6 in
> > 	parallel - usually IPv4 is NATed, and IPv6 is globally reachable
> > 	(sometimes IPv6 filtering device is in place).  i don't 
> > share your
> > 	view on this aspect on customer demand.
> > 
> > itojun
> > 
> > 
>