[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: on NAT-PT

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: on NAT-PT
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:56:45 +0100
Cc: itojun@iijlab.net, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3DE5DEE3.10B63AFB@hursley.ibm.com>
References: <20021128061346.B1F1F4B23@coconut.itojun.org> <3DE5DEE3.10B63AFB@hursley.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:16:19 +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I think we need an RFC which discusses the issues with NAT-PT
> that are discussed for NAT-v4 in RFC 2993 and RFC 3027.
> Maybe it could be quite short, if the issues are the same,
> but it needs to be written.

I think we should also descibe the specific issues of translating
between address families. With dual stack hosts, there is the issue
of getting a translated address when un-translated communication is
possible. There is also the issue where to put these boxes (near the
v4-only host, near the v6-only host or somewhere in between). And
probably others.

	rvdp

References:
- Re: on NAT-PT
  - From: itojun@iijlab.net
- Re: on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Previous by thread: Re: on NAT-PT
Next by thread: Re: on NAT-PT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread