[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:35:26 +0200
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405091255230.11201-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <20040509091328.GA9937@sverresborg.uninett.no> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405091255230.11201-100000@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 01:01:03PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
[...]
> In other words, such "multicast tunnels" would be only used for very
> specific applications, one tunnel per (group of) applications, as a 
> means to leverage existing v4 multicast infrastructure to obtain the 
> benefit of no multicast->unicast conversion/duplication in the 
> network.

Ah, I see. Yes, that's an interesting idea (:

Stig

References:
- Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
- Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
Next by Date: Review requested: draft-daniel-dhc-ipv6in4-opt-03.txt
Previous by thread: Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
Next by thread: Re: v6-in-v4 configured tunneling over v4 multicast (vs 6over4)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread