[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 3GPP Analysis revision -10 (resolving IESG comments)



I've cleared my discuss.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juha.wiljakka@nokia.com [mailto:juha.wiljakka@nokia.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:51 AM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: mankin@psg.com; sah@428cobrajet.net; hardie@qualcomm.com; 
> housley@vigilsec.com; david.kessens@nokia.com; 
> bwijnen@lucent.com; jon.peterson@neustar.biz; spencer@mcsr-labs.org
> Subject: 3GPP Analysis revision -10 (resolving IESG comments)
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I finally managed to compose revision -10 of the 3GPP 
> Analysis document. The draft can be found here:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-anal
> ysis-10.txt
> 
> The document now *should* resolve IESG discuss comments, the 
> major changes compared to -09 are the following:
> - summary/recommendations section
> - IMS scenario 1 text (based on Allison Mankin's text) - I am 
> still a bit unsure about the text...
> - editorial changes / proofreading done by Spencer Dawkins
> 
> This is what I wrote in the summary/recommendations section:
> ------------
>     This document has analyzed five GPRS and two IMS IPv6 transition 
>     scenarios. Numerous 3GPP networks are using private IPv4 
> addresses 
>     today, and introducing IPv6 is an important thing. The two first 
>     GPRS scenarios and both IMS scenarios are seen the most relevant. 
>     The authors summarize some main recommendations here: 
>        - Dual-stack UEs are recommended instead of IPv4-only or IPv6-
>          only UEs. It is important to take care that the applications 
>          in the UEs support IPv6. IPv6-only UEs can become feasible 
>          when IPv6 is widely deployed in the networks, and most 
>          services work on IPv6. 
>        - It is recommended to activate an IPv6 PDP context when 
>          communicating with an IPv6 peer node and an IPv4 PDP context 
>          when communicating with an IPv4 peer node. 
>        - IPv6 communication is preferred to IPv4 communication going 
>          through IPv4 NATs to the same dual stack peer node. 
>        - This document strongly recommends the 3GPP operators 
> to deploy 
>          basic IPv6 support in their GPRS networks as soon as 
> possible. 
>          That makes it possible to lessen the transition 
> effects in the 
>          UEs. 
>        - A tunneling mechanism in the UE may be needed during 
> the early 
>          phases of the IPv6 transition process. A lightweight, 
>          automatic tunneling mechanism should be standardized in the 
>          IETF. 
>        - Tunneling mechanisms can be used in 3GPP networks, and only 
>          generic recommendations are given in this document. More 
>          details can be found, for example, in [ISP-sa]. 
>        - We recommend that a detailed solution for the general 
>          SIP/SDP/media IPv4/IPv6 transition problem will be specified 
>          as soon as possible as a task within the SIP WGs in 
> the IETF. 
> -----------
> 
> Rgds,
> 	 -Juha W.-
>