Re: IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-02.txt

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:53:13AM -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> This is my suggestion.
> 
> IMO, the concern that adding a normative reference
> to RFC 3484 will prevent promotion to draft standard
> is misplaced.  Before moving to DS, a draft must have
> two interoperable implementations and "successful
> operational experience".  The whole purpose of the
> multi-tiered standards process is to identify problems
> (such as the address selection problems in this draft)
> and correct them before documents move to higher
> levels of the standards track.

This sounds good to me.

Tim