[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSTM

To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: DSTM
From: Fred Templin <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:47:25 -0700
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA09AC7D57@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.nt dev.microsoft.com> <20040623175329.GN17875@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <p0602048abcfff50a755c@[10.0.0.39]> <E0D5F18A-C5BF-11D8-A349-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

IPv4 over it where needed as soon as the necessary mechanisms (IPv4-in-IPv6 tunneling, IPv6 DNS resolver discovery) are available and all the hardware can handle IPv6 in the fast path. (I had a few conversations with vendors at the summit thing last week and many still do IPv6 in software.)

IPv6 flows are identified by the 3-tuple of (src, dst, flow_id), i.e.,
there are 128+128+20=276 bits needed for handling IPv6 in the
fast path. Is anyone making CAMs that wide?

Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

References:
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ISATAP (Was RE: DSTM)
Next by Date: RE: ISATAP (Was RE: DSTM)
Previous by thread: Re: DSTM
Next by thread: Re: DSTM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread