[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving forward

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Moving forward
From: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:31:41 -0700
In-reply-to: <20040701094201.GD24721@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <F4410B91C6CC314F9582B1A8E91DC928BEEC89@ftmail2000> <20040701094201.GD24721@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Tim,

On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:42:01AM +0100, Tim Chown wrote:
> 
> I am confused, why was the transition work moved to Operations Area then if
> there actually was never any way we could specify new mechanisms or finalise
> existing ones?   And why talk of a temporary ban when it could never have
> been lifted in the v6ops WG?

My message was about 'moving forward'. This process will allow us to
finally start moving proposals towards standards track. 

David Kessens
---

References:
- RE: Moving forward
  - From: "Soliman Hesham" <H.Soliman@flarion.com>
- Re: Moving forward
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Moving forward
Next by Date: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-03.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Moving forward
Next by thread: Re: Moving forward
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread