RE: draft agenda for v6ops at IETF60

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Liu Min wrote:
> I have already requested for a time slot for 5 min to introduce the
> latest development & demonstration of Silkroad and discuss how to go
> forward. I'm very surprised that I have not received any feedback to
> tell me whether my application is accepted or not. But there is no
> arrangement in the draft agenda. :( Could you please tell me whether
> I have the chance to give my presentation?

The primary reasoning for excluding this request from the agenda was
that there isn't sufficient time, energy or need for covering all the
mechanisms out there (and just having a presentation of one or a 
couple of them might be unfair).

It looks like the discussion could also be held on the list -- as a 
matter of fact, I think there already was a long debate.

(I personally recall the discussion ended silently, but it seemed as
if Silkroad was a tunnel broker with UDP encapsulation for traversing
NATs.  But we have already had those on the table for years..)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings