Re: draft agenda for v6ops at IETF60

[Fred Templin <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>]

Hello Pekka,

I would like to request an agenda slot to discuss:

 http://www.geocities.com/osprey67/v6v4inet-01.txt
 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-v6v4inet-00.txt

(The -01 updates the current -00 and will be submitted after
the I-D repository re-opens.)

The document discusses a general framework for IPv6/IPv4
coexistence and, as such, is not specific to any particular
mechanism. The abstract appears below:

Thanks - Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

Abstract

  The IPv6 128-bit address space was designed as a solution for the
  32-bit limitation of IPv4, but the proliferation of IPv4 in the
  global Internet continues via private addressing domains behind
  Network Address Translators (NATs). Furthermore, a formerly popular
  viewpoint that IPv6 networks would soon replace IPv4 networks seems
  to be yielding to an emerging viewpoint of long-term coexistence.
  This document proposes a coexistence scenario with IPv6 for end-to-
  end addressing and IPv4 for inter-networking.


Pekka Savola wrote:

> Hi,
>
> See below the current draft agenda for v6ops sessions at IETF60.
>
> The sessions are currently scheduled for Monday night and Friday
> morning.  Let's hope that the latter one, at least, changes.
>
> Updates or changes are very likely still.
>
> Please send in your thoughts, further agenda requests, comments, etc.
>
> =========
>
>
>
> First session
> =============
> (Tentatively scheduled for Monday night)
>
> Introduction and agenda bashing - 5 mins, Chairs/Savola
>  - Scribes! (Jabber also?)
>
> Document status - 15 mins, Chairs/Savola
> - What has happened with WG documents lately
> - GOAL: show the status of WG documents
>
> Moving forward with Mechanisms - 45 mins, Chairs/ADs
> - [placeholder as of yet, plans still forming]
> - GOAL: discuss the procedure of how to move forward
>
> VLAN Usage for IPv6 transition - 5 mins, Chown?
> - draft-chown-v6ops-vlan-usage-01.txt [expired, to be revised]
> - GOAL: describe the procedure, discuss whether to go for Informational RFC
>
> Enterprise solution case study: Campus Transition - 20 mins, Chown
> - draft-chown-v6ops-campus-transition-00.txt
> - examine a case study of applying the enterprise scenarios document,
>   discuss the issues.
> - GOAL: give input to the Enterprise solutions work and the necessity
>   of transition tools.
>
> IPv6 Security Overview - 10 mins, Savola
> - draft-savola-v6ops-security-overview-02.txt
> - introduce the approach and justify the need; discuss changes.
> - GOAL: take as a WG item, solicit an editor.
>
> Assisted Tunneling Requirements - 15 mins, Durand
> - draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements-00.txt
> - go through open issues, discuss
> - GOAL: resolve issues, revise and advance after IETF60
>
> Tunnel-endpoint Discovery, 10 mins, Palet?
> - draft-palet-v6ops-tun-auto-disc-01.txt
> - discuss different approaches to discover the v6-in-v4 endpoint
>   (to be used with assisted tunneling and maybe others)
> - GOAL: get more feedback, adopt as WG item?
>
> Secure IPv6 Tunneling - 10 mins, Graveman
> - draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-00.txt
> - discuss the method of using IPsec to create secure v6-in-v4 tunnels
> - GOAL: get more input, adopt as WG item?
>
> Protocol-41 Forwarding in NAT boxes - 10 mins, Palet
> - [to be: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-05.txt]
> - GOAL: discuss changes and approach, adopt as WG item for Informational
>
> Measurement of Misbehaving DNS Servers - 5 mins, Savola channeling Malone
> - (based on draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-01.txt)
> - GOAL: show relative numbers of misbehaving servers vs IPv6 records
>
>
> Second session
> ==============
> (Tentatively scheduled for Friday morning, hopefully will change)
>
> [If good discussion is generated on the discussion items on the first
> session, add time to discuss those here]
>
> IPv6 replacement for NAT boxes etc. - 10 mins, van de Welde?
> - [no draft]
> - GOAL: present early work on an Informational draft on how to deploy
>   v6 in environments where NATs and/or private addressing were used.
>
> Moving forward, take two, 30 mins, Chairs/ADs
> - [placeholder]
> - GOAL: continue tuning the process as necessary
>
> IPv6 Mobility Scenarios/Requirements update, 10 mins, Williams
> - [follow-up on draft-yamamoto-mipv6node-v4trav-00.txt]
> - GOAL: follow up from where we left off with in the last meeting
>
> "Auto-transition": picking the right mechanism - 10 mins, Palet
> - draft-palet-v6ops-auto-trans-00.txt
> - GOAL: discuss the concepts, whether useful for the WG.
>
> Distributed v6 security requirements/problem statement - 10 mins, Palet
> - draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6security-00.txt
> - draft-vives-v6ops-ipv6-security-ps-00.txt
> - GOAL: get input from the WG
>
> [These might at least might drop off from the agenda if there are no
> significant updates or interest:]
>
> Transition mechanisms update, 5 mins, Chairs/Savola
> - draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-03.txt
> - GOAL: discuss how to address the DNS lookup ordering issue
>
> IPv6-on-by-Default - 5 mins, ?
> - draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-01.txt
> - GOAL: discuss what has been happening with this work
>
> IPv6 Renumbering Procedures - 5 mins, Baker?
> - draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-renumber-procedure-01.txt
> - GOAL: discuss major issues, if raised during the IESG evaluation
>
> Advanced L3 IPv6 Exchange Model - 10 mins, Palet
> - draft-morelli-v6ops-ipv6-ix-00.txt
> - GOAL: get input from the WG
> =============
>
>
>