[I always seem to use v6ops@ietf.org instead of v6ops@ops.ietf.org, thus here it is...] [ Cross-post, to get everybody in sync, Other messages in this thread can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/ipv6-wg/2004/msg00089.html ] On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 09:58, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > On 2004-07-22, at 09.43, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone > > for me. > > I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two > reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve. Take your pick: http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.html http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.txt http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.xml Short, quick and easy. If no comments are risen for 16:00 today I'll submit this as an ID. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part