Re: Teredo for Standards Track in Unman scenarios?

[Vincent Jardin <Vincent.Jardin@6wind.com>]

Pekka Savola wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Liu Min wrote:
>  
>
> > > Teredo is implemented and deployed, and there are multiple
> > > implementations.
> > >      
> > Where can I find the multiple implementation of Teredo? I know an IPv6 stack
> > that supports Teredo is available with the <Advanced Networking Pack for
> > Windows XP>. Where can I find the Teredo server and Teredo relay?
> >    
>
> I'd assume some Windows Server would also support server/relay
> functionality.  Apart from that.. I've came across two -- I don't know
> which version they implement, and which parts they implement; not
> having tested any of them personally, I also don't know how they would
> interoperate:
>
> http://www-rp.lip6.fr/teredo/
> http://www.simphalempin.com/dev/miredo/
>  
FYI, both interoperate. The main difference is based on the implementation:
 - the LIP6/6WIND Teredo implementation is using a Kernel 
implementation (BSD license)
 - Miredo is using a user land implementation (GPL license)

They implement the Relay and Server part.

The latest and non-stable releases are available thru the same CVS server:
 http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/teredo/

Regards,
 Vincent