[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

To: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message with ID" <1091131636.4598.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

>   IPv4 over IPv6 tunneling mechanism

Did your analysis indicate what type of configuration support is
needed for this, and whether direction connection (e.g. between
two hosts on the same LAN) is required?

The reason I'm asking is because potentially the IPv4 over IPv6 tunneling
is just as rich as the IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling with lots of different
possible requirements. Trying to narrow things down would be useful.

   Erik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
  - From: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-chown-v6ops-campus-transition-00 comments
Next by Date: Re: draft-palet-v6ops-auto-trans-01 comments
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by thread: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread