IESG evaluation draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-05

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

Hi,

The IESG approved the publication of 
draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-05.txt as is.

However, there were three minor non-blocking comments which might be
worth considering:

1)
[rhousley] [IN IESG DISCUSSION]
  Should VoIP be discussed in this document?  There are usually QoS
  issues associated with VoIP that deserve consideration.

2)
[hta] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] Reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART
Nit: Example Network B uses the word "external" twice with different 
meanings; that's confusing...

3)
[mrw] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] My affiliation is wrong in this document:  
s/ThinkMagic/ThingMagic.  Could be fixed in AUTH48 if at all.

3) is trivially fixed later on, so there's no need to worry about it
now.  The question is whether it would make sense to consider which
changes would be needed to fix 1) or 2) (or whether we just go on as
is).  If the fixes are simple, these could be done as an RFC-editor
note as well, without respinning the document.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings