[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 :ip6.int shutdown?)

To: jim.bound@hp.com
Subject: RE: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 :ip6.int shutdown?)
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:18:49 +0900 (JST)
Cc: jeroen@unfix.org, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, sig-ipv6@apnic.net, ipv6-wg@ripe.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:13:57 -0400" <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B06AFF574@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B06AFF574@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>

	related topic...
	it looks that there's lame delegation in ip6.int tree.
	"int" servers have NS glue for "ip6.int" servers, however,
	two of them does not respond to ip6.int query at all, and
	the other two responds with SERVFAIL.

itojun

References:
- RE: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 :ip6.int shutdown?)
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: IESG evaluation draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-05
Next by Date: Re: [ipv6-wg@ripe.net] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Previous by thread: RE: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 :ip6.int shutdown?)
Next by thread: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread