|
Hi Juha,
Here are my first set of
comments:
section 6.3
"The tunnel protocol
should allow the usage of native IPv6
connectivity whenever such is available."
=> Isnt this paragraph is redundant? the 3rd paragraph in this section says it all.
section 6.5 " The
discovery mechanism should rely on intrinsic services,
read services already universally deployed, to the particular network
^^ environment." => should be "...in a particular environment."
"It should not require the addition of additional IP network ..." ^^^^^^^^^^
=> can be mentioned as "..addition of new IP network infrastructure..."
section 6.6 " The tunnel protocol must allow for
the assignment of at least one globally routable (/128) IPv6
unicast address to use for tunneled IPv6 connectivity over the link
provided by the Zero-Configuration Tunneling
mechanism. " => not very clear about the meaning of this paragraph. i guess it means that tunnel protocol gets a global IPv6 address before establishing a tunnel link for IPv6 connectivity. am i right?
section 6.8 => does NUD (in section 3.8 in RFC 2893) helps? or does it help NOT having it for sake of saving Radio power?
Apart from this as i had already mentioned in my previous mails about a thought of expanding the applicability of this document beyond 3GPP. Maybe this is for the WG chair to decide.
Thanks Radhakrishnan
|