[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-00.txt (fwd)
Jim,
your proposal sounds like a plan. If the WG decides to remain silent
until next week, please produce another draft without comments. I guess,
the WG will speak up sooner or later!
Cheers,
Jonne.
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 20:33, ext Bound, Jim wrote:
> Hi Jonne,
>
> Sorry for late response I am traveling yet again. I agree with what Tim
> stated and also the team is ready to go. Before we solidified the
> recommendations we wanted the WG to respond as Tim pointed out. We can
> move forward but that has more risk. I can present our status and
> results at D.C and suggest that I should if you and Pekka agree. But
> let us know ok.
>
> Seems like we should move forward. I suggest we give WG till next
> Tuesday to respond ok? Then we have no choice but to go to next rev.
> Its to bad we just lost at least 2 weeks from no input of stagnation?
>
> Thanks
> /jim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Soininen Jonne
> > (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)
> > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:33 AM
> > To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-00.txt (fwd)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > <Chair hat on>
> > I'm wondering why there are no comments to this draft. To
> > kick-off the discussion I'm going to provide some of my own.
> > However, please, comment the draft! We cannot move forward if
> > people don't comment!
> > <Chair hat off>
> >
> > I'm not going to comment much on the details. As it is the
> > first version, I'm just trying to express my opinion on the
> > general direction of the draft.
> >
> > First of all, there is a lot of information in the draft
> > about how the transition/deployment of IPv6 in enterprise
> > environment is to be done.
> > However, the conclusions seem not to be clearly derivable
> > from the text.
> > I think the goal of the document is to have clear conclusions
> > what is expected from the IETF to be done (nothing -
> > everything is already done, requirements for transition
> > protocols/mechanisms, identifying the protocol needed).
> >
> > I think this is somewhat in the document, but not clearly
> > enough. So, what I would like to see is more clearly the link
> > between the actual text of the document and the conclusions
> > in the section 8. At least to me it is not clear how the
> > conclusions have been reached.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jonne.
> > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 12:29, ext Pekka Savola wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > (co-chair hat on)
> > >
> > > There haven't been any reviews on the list. That's not
> > good. We need
> > > the reviews to make this go forward. Otherwise we cannot
> > go forward
> > > with this, and we cannot go forward with the transition
> > mechanisms for
> > > the enterprises.
> > >
> > > PLEASE provide feedback ASAP!
> > >
> > > (co-chair hat off)
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:24:32 +0300 (EEST)
> > > From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> > > To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-00.txt
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > (co-chair hat on)
> > >
> > > This is the initial draft on Enterprise network analysis,
> > and is still
> > > being improved. We need input from the WG to make it
> > better. Please
> > > read and comment ASAP, preferably within a week. We hope
> > to get this
> > > in the shape for WG last call reasonably soon.
> > >
> > > Again, please send feedback. This is very important work!
> > >
> > > (hat off)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
> > Internet-Drafts directories.
> > > > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working
> > Group of the IETF.
> > > >
> > > > Title : IPv6 Enterprise Network Analysis
> > > > Author(s) : J. Bound, et al.
> > > > Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-00.txt
> > > > Pages : 30
> > > > Date : 2004-9-16
> > > >
> > > > This document analyzes the transition to IPv6 in enterprise
> > > > networks. These networks are characterized as a network
> > that has
> > > > multiple internal links, one or more router connections,
> > to one or
> > > > more Providers, and is managed by a network operations
> > entity. The
> > > > analysis will focus on a base set of transition units and
> > > > requirements expanded from a previous Enterprise Scenarios
> > > > document, and will depict a set of components and transition
> > > > methods required for the enterprise to transition to IPv6 within
> > > > each scenario and then common to all scenarios.
> > > >
> > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > > >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-00
> > > > .txt
> > > [...]
> > >
> > --
> > Jonne Soininen
> > Nokia
> >
> > Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
> > E-mail: jonne.soininen@nokia.com
> >
> >
--
Jonne Soininen
Nokia
Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: jonne.soininen@nokia.com