Re: A personal take on WG's priorities..

["EricLKlein" <ericlklein@softhome.net>]

From: "Brian
> Quite obviously, it would be outrageous to attempt all this
> in one WG. IMHO, we need to either out-source work to other
> WGs or create several new WGs with focussed charters.
> Especially, we need to separate "getting known stuff
> fully operational" from "doing new stuff."

Is it possible to try to set up "sub-WG" areas and recruit more specialized
people into these areas?

I am thinking (of the top of my head) of three subgroups:
- Enterprise - would include migration issues, etc.
- ISPs - would handle tunnels, interconnections, etc
- IPv6 Security - would handle NAT-PT, depreciating NAT in IPv6, etc.

Just a thought.
Eric