[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices

To: Dwight Jamieson <djamies@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:00:13 +0100 (CET)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <F1A1D21DA394814E824AC89F5A005BA30854697A@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>
References: <F1A1D21DA394814E824AC89F5A005BA30854697A@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>

Hi,
	I do prefer working solutions that exist for site multihoming:

e.g RFC 3178. I also cover several alternatives in my IPv6 Multihomingpresentation: http://www.6diss.org/workshops/saf/multihoming.pdf


Regards,

Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE  21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98


On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Dwight Jamieson wrote:



In the absence of mature protocol support for site multi-homing (shim6),
what are the best practice recommendations for an enterprise or service
provider?

Cheers,
Dwight

References:
- V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices
  - From: "Dwight Jamieson" <djamies@nortel.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Tiny fragments and IPv6
Next by Date: RE: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices
Previous by thread: RE: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices
Next by thread: Re: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread