[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: towards phasing out the 6bone

To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Subject: Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:09:37 +0100
Cc: bob@thefinks.com, JINMEI Tatuya / ???????????? <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, bob.hinden@nokia.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20051227021417.GA21900@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Mail-followup-to: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, bob@thefinks.com, JINMEI Tatuya / ???????????? <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, bob.hinden@nokia.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <y7voe3430lg.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> <2a8350a60512252229m36066dd1k968755cb972407ee@mail.gmail.com> <20051227021417.GA21900@vacation.karoshi.com.>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 02:14:17AM +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 	will -ALL- 3ffe routes be filtered?  i don't  think
> 	this wil be the case.

Sure. Why should there be any exception? I myself will definately filter
3ffe BGP _and_ packet source/destination at the edge. And I'm seeing at
least BGP filtering coming at some large IPv6 ISPs coming too.

Frankly, there is nothing of importance in it anymore anyway, so why
care at all?

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

Follow-Ups:
- Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
  - From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
- RE: towards phasing out the 6bone
  - From: "James Jun" <james@towardex.com>

References:
- towards phasing out the 6bone
  - From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
- Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
  - From: Robert Fink <bobfink@gmail.com>
- Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
  - From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com

Prev by Date: Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
Next by Date: RE: towards phasing out the 6bone
Previous by thread: Re: towards phasing out the 6bone
Next by thread: RE: towards phasing out the 6bone
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread