Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-06.txt

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:44:12AM -0700, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > As a co-author (and of course I was recused in
> > the IESG discussion) my main concern is to
> > see the RFC published ASAP.
> 
> Seconded.

Very happy to defer to Brian's wishes.   The document has been widely
cited as a draft of course, but final publication will make it even easier
to point people at.    I suspect we'll end up referring to is by RFC
number rather than name as it'll be easier to say (like 2775 or 3041).

[BTW if NAT can apparently be confused with NAP in discussion, I wonder
 whether LNP's other common meaning will cause confusion that the draft
 formerly known as NAP has something to do with number portability for
 IPv6]

-- 
Tim