Hei, Inline. Le vendredi 30 mars 2007 09:53, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo) a écrit : > I think the question is if it is worth the trouble at this point. And > is there some protocol evolution needed based on the practical > experiences with the protocol. You and me cannot answer that. I think > the people shipping the products can. > > I also would like to know is the "ISATAP" in the products the same as > the "ISATAP" in RFC4214? If ISATAP != ISATAP it would really be worth > while updating the document and bring the deployed ISATAP to PS. Interestingly, TEREDO PS is not quite TEREDO deployed - did not seem to bother, though I dunno which place if any would be right to discuss that. (This is just a side not. I am hereby not advocating anything on ISATAP or TEREDO.) -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/
Attachment:
pgpXyimCiR30g.pgp
Description: PGP signature