[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy

To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
Subject: Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:10 +0200
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pXArSPTM+l5JHRKy0Jq3mEDdoZunQK/ermiddkdQzaYbNSqZDRRJvw5sR/eH5sps6cBwmEFPQmz4WoBE2v9+C4/In+PRgJX7XYdKTgps4KnHLXMfXahu+6roH/g6+Y5WB4bdYWypcahfuZhAr0Pu5U5vNu+IIqIDhj6am/XpZf4=
In-reply-to: <20070724165848.A5355233CB@coconut.itojun.org>
References: <2677351C-7049-4D1F-BFEA-669722AC567B@inetcore.com> <20070724165848.A5355233CB@coconut.itojun.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)

      with "global
	unicast" basically i assume "global reachability".


I think we discovered during the original ULA discussion
that global scope and global uniqueness do not imply
global reachability. We have no way to express VPN style
reachability using scopes.

   Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
  - From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)

References:
- Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
  - From: Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>
- Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
  - From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)

Prev by Date: Re: CPE equipments and stateful filters
Next by Date: Re: CPE equipments and stateful filters
Previous by thread: Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
Next by thread: Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread