in any way instructive to the specific debate about IPv6. Lessons
learned from misconfigured DHCPv4/DNS services have no bearing on
this discussion.
- Ralph
On Aug 3, 2007, at Aug 3, 2007,5:01 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
Ralph Droms wrote:
...
We can certainly argue about whether RAs are fundamentally more
problematic than DHCP and whether what we need to do is fix ND or
extend DHCP; what I am reporting is what these operators have
told me
based on hands-on experience with deployed networks.
Other deployed networks have hands-on experience showing RA is
cheaper for
them to operate, and the Chicago network was a showcase for the
operational
realities that people experience every day. I am arguing there are
cases for
both deployment models, so we should not be wasting energy
debating between
them, we just need to fix them both so we don't hang in this
bizarre state
where both are required because neither are sufficient as-is.
If the IESG is going to insist that there has to be a one-size-
fits-all
answer, they all need to be shot during this nomcom round.
Tony