Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

[Gert Doering <gert@space.net>]

Hi,

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:12:27AM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Implementing "dual stack" is not much harder than implementing "IPv6
> only", so this is pretty much a no-brainer.

I want to challenge that.  How are you going to implement "dual stack"
if no more IPv4 addresses are available?

Which is going to be a fairly typical scenario for new networks, some
years into the future.

(For the ISP backbone, dual stack is usually fairly easily done, because
the number addresses needed is small - but what about the end user networks?)

Gert Doering
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  122119

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279