[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Subject: RE: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:35:43 -0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, David Miles <davidm@thetiger.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20071111095909.GH69215@Space.Net>
References: <5FCD348C-5927-4F18-A002-0E3BF21ED5F4@NLnetLabs.nl> <47110056.70400@piuha.net> <47251FBA.9030507@gmail.com> <FBBEC281-65AB-47C6-A9D8-389DB9435D55@thetiger.com> <4726453A.2030500@gmail.com> <E5EF3E67-1C35-44EC-8EDC-9376AEA3A620@muada.com> <AFE0AC8DCDE68842B94E8EC69D5F21D604E359EBD7@NA-EXMSG-W602.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <20071111095909.GH69215@Space.Net>

> From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@space.net]
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 1:59 AM
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:12:27AM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > Implementing "dual stack" is not much harder than implementing "IPv6
> > only", so this is pretty much a no-brainer.
>
> I want to challenge that.  How are you going to implement "dual stack"
> if no more IPv4 addresses are available?

I meant "implementing dual stack in a device". Suppose you have built an IPv6 capable device. The added requirements for supporting IPv4 boils down to DHCPv4 client, ARP support, and a little bit of glue. That really is not a lot of "real estate".

-- Christian Huitema

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>

References:
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: David Miles <davidm@thetiger.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- RE: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Next by Date: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Previous by thread: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Next by thread: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread