Hi, On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 07:35:43AM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:12:27AM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote: > > > Implementing "dual stack" is not much harder than implementing "IPv6 > > > only", so this is pretty much a no-brainer. > > > > I want to challenge that. How are you going to implement "dual stack" > > if no more IPv4 addresses are available? > > I meant "implementing dual stack in a device". Suppose you have > built an IPv6 capable device. The added requirements for supporting > IPv4 boils down to DHCPv4 client, ARP support, and a little bit of > glue. That really is not a lot of "real estate". I agree - and I misunderstood this (as Stephen Sprunk also pointed out) as "deploying in a network". The network stack should not very hard. Gert -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 122119 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Attachment:
pgpRVOaN3tuHA.pgp
Description: PGP signature