[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:01:56 -0800
In-reply-to: <40142B09-4FDF-46F3-8735-398BA5B8D24C@muada.com>
References: <5FCD348C-5927-4F18-A002-0E3BF21ED5F4@NLnetLabs.nl> <47110056.70400@piuha.net> <47251FBA.9030507@gmail.com> <D4F1AE3B-0534-4EFB-847E-4209503A45AD@thingmagic.com> <40142B09-4FDF-46F3-8735-398BA5B8D24C@muada.com>

On Nov 12, 2007, at 01:17, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

On 12 nov 2007, at 4:06, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Exactly what types of operational problems exist that we need tosolve?
The problem is that there is no operational problem: IPv6deployment can still generously be rounded down to 0.



Some of us would argue that's an operational *solution*, not a problem.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>

References:
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
- Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Regarding I-D Action:draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Previous by thread: Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Next by thread: Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread