Re: Problem statement, was: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

[Gert Doering <gert@space.net>]

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:01:56AM -0800, james woodyatt wrote:
> >The problem is that there is no operational problem: IPv6  
> >deployment can still generously be rounded down to 0.
> Some of us would argue that's an operational *solution*, not a problem.

So what's your approach to handling the "there won't be any new IPv4
addresses to distribute to customers after a not-so-far-distant point
in the future"?

I'm fairly serious about this - we *will* run into this, and so far, IPv6
seems to be the only solution.  No matter how many rough edges it has
today.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  122119

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279