Le Thursday 29 November 2007 20:18:59 todd@fries.net, vous avez écrit : > So we hack the os to fix the broken dns servers. whee! Progress! Does OpenBSD refuse to work behind a NAT because it is not legal from RFC perspective? Silly me, I almost forgot the pf own NAT implementation did not even remotely match the IETF BEHAVE specifications. There is a (rather small) market for OSes that do everything "right" from a technical perspective, and there is a (rather large) market for OSes that just works. As it happens, OpenBSD can afford to aim only at the first market - good for you! Conversely, most computer users cannot afford to use OpenBSD. As such, I don't think we want to limit the relevance of IETF to *only* the do-things-right market. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.