[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: v4 side unmodifiable

To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: v4 side unmodifiable
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 13:33:08 -0800
Cc: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA232B1B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <9B487B6D-52C9-4FEA-A326-E415A271F756@muada.com> <C37DF260.1B0B51%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA232B1B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:

* Any node that does not have a v6 implementation today
  probably does not want one. So any v4 based changes will
  not be delployed
* Why would a v4 host that has no pain currently try to change
  itself to talk to a v6 host (who has the pain). The pain should
  be where the gain is.


yes...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHXF8UbjEdbHIsm0MRAjNCAKC+Zerk5Qu4FQ6QcBsEIdB63GJrlgCdEgat
yXdCmvcOSs83b27YhgW41F0=
=G6wd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: v4 side unmodifiable
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

References:
- v4 side unmodifiable
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: v4 side unmodifiable
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
- RE: v4 side unmodifiable
  - From: "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: Re: v4 side unmodifiable
Next by Date: Re: v4 side unmodifiable
Previous by thread: RE: v4 side unmodifiable
Next by thread: Re: v4 side unmodifiable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread