Title of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-0x

[Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>]

marcelo bagnulo braun  - Le 7/23/08 11:04 AM :
> Rémi Després escribió:

> > Since the document deals  with requirements only for v4-v6 translation 
> > mechanisms, what about making it clear in the title, e.g.:
> >
> > "Pv4/IPv6 Coexistence - Requirements for solutions based on IPv4-IPv6 
> > translations". 
>
> cause due the dual nature of the document, the current tittle actually 
> fits the first part of the doccment

 Yes, exactly.

 The first part is about scenarios, all of them, and the second part is 
about requirements, but only for NAT64 based solutions.
 "IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition: Requirements for solutions", 
suggests that all solutions have their requirements covered, which is 
misleading.

 Including requirements for other solutions would solve the problem, 
but your legitimate wish to wrap up asap makes it unrealistic.

 Examples of others title that IMO would fit:

 "IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence scenarios - Requirements for v4-v6 translation 
 mechanisms"

 "IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence scenarios - Requirements for NAT64 based solutions"


 Note that updating the title doesn't imply a change of the file-name 
(draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-0x is OK).


 Regards

RD