RE: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

Fred,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:22 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Brian E Carpenter; IPv6 Operations; Behave Chairs
> Subject: Re: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn
> 
> well, remembering that we are actually NOT CHARTERED TO DISCUSS
> TRANSITION ALGORITHMS, no. What I have been told is that matters
> relating to network address translation and network protocol
> translation have been moved to the working group chartered to discuss
> that.

Sorry - I used a wrong word. I meant to say "IPv6 operations";
not "IPv6 ****sitions".

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> 
> On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> 
> > Fred,
> >
> >> Well, yes. My understanding is that the topic of CGNs is moving to
> >> behave, and so should be submitted to behave. You can verify with
the
> >> behave chairs.
> >
> > The subject matter of this document seems more concerned
> > with what IPv6 operational functions could be placed on a
> > platform that might also support a CGN function, rather
> > than the behavioral aspects of CGN itself. If the bulk
> > of the material is about IPv6 transitions, wouldn't that
> > qualify the document to remain targeted to this group?
> >
> > Fred
> > fred.l.templin@boeing.com