Re: VoIP peering & routing protocols (revisited)

[Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>]

At 12:19 PM 4/19/2005, Kalogiros Constantinos wrote:

> Hello, I' m a PhD candidate interested in VoIP peering and new to this list.
> I always thought that the main shortcoming of TRIP is lack of pricing 
> information (resulting in poor selection criteria).

The complexity of BGP is another.

>  If this is true, why providers don't employ H.323 based protocols 
> (H.225.0 Annex G or H.501)?
> I'd be thankful if you shared your thoughts with me.

because no one these days is deploying H.323 .... SIP is the protocol of 
choice.


> Costas Kalogiros
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send a message to voip-peering-request@psg.com with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> An archive is at <http://psg.com/lists/voip-peering/>.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141@fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


--
To unsubscribe send a message to voip-peering-request@psg.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
An archive is at <http://psg.com/lists/voip-peering/>.