Erik Hetzner wrote: >If somebody looked at the code I linked to & ensured that it did not >do anything bad, perhaps the maintainers could add read-only mbox >support to a later release of WL. The problem with mbox is that there is no reliable way to check whether it is safe to read the mbox file or not. I.e.: Maybe another process is currently appending a message to the mbox. Or removes something while WL is reading the file. Or uses a locking mechanism the prevents WL from reading the file. -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de
Attachment:
pgpNKuykgk5RK.pgp
Description: PGP signature